Case Study

Published on Mar 17, 2023

No Description

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Case Study

Contract Law or Agency Law?

THE CASE

Photo by dbking

New Century Financial Services v. Denneger
Failure to repay credit card debt.

New Century Financial Services sued to collect debt from Mr. Denneger, whose name was on a credit card. Mr. Denneger claimed he was not aware of this card, did not open the account, and did not make the charges. Therefore, he was not liable for the debt. The defendant was found liable and on appeal, the ruling was upheld (Fisher, n. d.)

CASE DETAILS

Photo by dbking

New Century Financial's Position:
Denneger is liable for the charges.
Denneger's Position:
Not liable; he was unaware that the card had been opened in his name.

Mr. Denneger lived with Mr. Knutson in a house owned by Mr. Denneger. Mr. Knutson did not work. Mr. Denneger provided the income for the household and Mr. Knutson handled the mail and bill paying for the household. Mr. Denneger admits that he rarely signed checks himself, so it seems Mr. Knutson was signing his name. Mr. Knutson died in 2003 and Mr. Denneger became aware of a credit card in his name and that the balance was due (Fisher, n. d.).

APPLICABLE LAWS

Photo by dbking

Contract Law?
or
Agency Law?

To support the ruling of the defendant found liable for the credit card charges, we look to contract law and agency law. Contracts are legal agreements between two entities where one provides an offer, the other party accepts the offer and there is mutual understanding of the agreement between them.

The contract is the offer of a line of credit between the company and the defendant, Mr. Denneger, and the promise to pay the debt incurred (University of Texas, n. d.).

Agency Law is also applicable to this court case. An agency relationship happens where a principal assigns responsibility to an agent. The agent represents the primary for those duties. Agency Law helps govern the relationship between the two entities. The relationship established between Mr. Knutson and Mr. Denneger for mail and bill payment is that of a principal and agent relationship (University of Texas, n. d.).

THE OUTCOME

Photo by dbking

Mr. Denneger lost his case and his appeal. He is liable for the debt.

This case is an example of agency law based on the legal definitions of contracts and the agent-principal relationship.

Mr. Knutson was authorized as an agent for Mr. Denneger. While they lived together, even prior to the opening of the credit card account, Mr. Knutson had access to the accounts of Mr. Denneger and had overseen the household mail, made payments for utilities, and even signed Mr. Denneger’s name to checks. The relationship of agent and principal is sufficiently established.
Photo by roosac

CONCLUSION
Mr. Knutson was an agent of Mr. Denneger. Opening a credit card account, using the card, and paying for household items were within the scope of his responsibility as established by Mr. Denneger prior to the opening of the line of credit.

Contract law doesn’t apply here since Mr. Knutson is an agent for Mr. Denneger and is acting within the scope of his duties. Fraudulent use does not apply here (Findlaw, n. d.). In addition, the creditor sent statements to Mr. Denneger’s house, payments had been made, and household items had been purchased. Mr. Denneger had every opportunity to review his finances but failed to.

A case in support of the ruling:

Minskoff v. American Express Travel Related Services (Findlaw, n. d.; Murray, 2015). An employee opened and charged up a credit card in the name of her principal. The principal and the company advised this was fraudulent use of a credit card, but the court found that she was within the scope of duties for the principal and company, and they were liable for the debt. The same reasons applied
Photo by wuestenigel

References

Tricia Freeland

Haiku Deck Pro User