CONCLUSION
Mr. Knutson was an agent of Mr. Denneger. Opening a credit card account, using the card, and paying for household items were within the scope of his responsibility as established by Mr. Denneger prior to the opening of the line of credit.
Contract law doesn’t apply here since Mr. Knutson is an agent for Mr. Denneger and is acting within the scope of his duties. Fraudulent use does not apply here (Findlaw, n. d.). In addition, the creditor sent statements to Mr. Denneger’s house, payments had been made, and household items had been purchased. Mr. Denneger had every opportunity to review his finances but failed to.
A case in support of the ruling:
Minskoff v. American Express Travel Related Services (Findlaw, n. d.; Murray, 2015). An employee opened and charged up a credit card in the name of her principal. The principal and the company advised this was fraudulent use of a credit card, but the court found that she was within the scope of duties for the principal and company, and they were liable for the debt. The same reasons applied