1 of 75

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

Wikipedia

Published on Nov 25, 2015

No Description

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Wikipedia

and Its Acceptance in Schools

Parents and teachers are always saying,

Photo by fung.leo

"Never believe anything you read on the internet."

IT is filled with

Photo by Toban B.

beliefs are abundant,

Photo by VinothChandar

But the question remains,

Photo by ultraBobban

is it really all that

Photo by freddie boy

Like everything,

Photo by kevin dooley

The Internet

Photo by Daniel*1977

Good

Photo by harold.lloyd

Over the years,

Photo by mrlins

Information

has become more easily accessible,
Photo by Orethorn

and is now

more accessible than ever,
Photo by Stéfan

with

  • 2.4 billion internet users
  • 367 million active websites
  • 62 percent of internet users researching
Photo by Kay Gaensler

one of these websites is

Wikipedia

the free encyclopedia
Photo by coofdy

WHICH HAS more than

  • 1.5 billion page edits
  • 25 million articles
  • 287 language editions of articles

despite this,

Wikipedia falls into a gray area
Photo by kevin dooley

Reputable,

Some consider Wikipedia to be

unreliable

while some consider it to be 
Photo by i k o

Wikipedia is mainly not trusted because

anyone can edit it,
Photo by blmiers2

however,

Photo by sickmouthy

wikipedia should be

allowed as a source for information in school because

vandalism

is quickly fixed, plus there is an edit history.
Photo by TaylorB90

its accuracy

is comparable to that of the Encyclopædia Britannica, 

It is Sourced,

plus it has an edit history.
Photo by ecstaticist

To begin,

"vandalism"

is when people intentionally put false information on an article.

Although vandalism occurs, 

it is not that common and does not stay posted for long.
Photo by VinothChandar

Not only that,

but when it occurs,
Photo by blmiers2

It is usually fixed very quickly.

Photo by Gordana AM

a 2007 study found that,

"42% of damage is repaired almost immediately".

There have been

many examples of Wikipedia vandalism

including,

Photo by alexbrn

Untitled Slide

Untitled Slide

Untitled Slide

Untitled Slide

Untitled Slide

verify suspicions,

although this may seem to only 
Photo by swisscan

these are only a few examples,

and most of them were already

Photo by DeeAshley

fixed

when the pictures were taken!
Photo by @Doug88888

Beyond that, 

wikipedia contains an

this contains

Information on things such as
Photo by Brînzei

edit wars,

which are battles where people edit an article back and forth.

Additionally,

Photo by DELLipo™

wikipedia's accuracy

Photo by Claudio.Ar

is comparable to that of a real encyclopedia.

Photo by jev55

In a 2005 study,

Wikipedia and the Encyclopædia Britannica were compared.
Photo by paloetic

The results

showed that the two were comparable in:
Photo by thebarrowboy

number of errors,

which was the main test.
Photo by Leo Reynolds

There have been

Photo by lukeroberts

many comparisons

of the two, and they all seem to have
Photo by VAN DEN BERGE

the same conclusion,

saying that they are mostly comparable.
Photo by harold.lloyd

Finally,

Photo by danielito311

sources

Wikipedia uses
Photo by jah~

in school,

we have to cite our work, and so does Wikipedia
Photo by krapow

Wikipedia

is full of citations.
Photo by cod_gabriel

it isn't as easy.

Although you can follow citations to their websites,
Photo by Mike Poresky

Extra work.

It creates
Photo by RLHyde

wikipedia

has enough sources to be used.

All in all,

Wikipedia

should be accepted in schools because
Photo by Haags Uitburo

vandalism

is quickly fixed, it is
Photo by jev55

comparable

to a trusted encyclopedia, and it has many
Photo by Bert Kaufmann

citations.

ask for a change

in our school.
Photo by ecstaticist

let's save ourselves the work

Photo by @notnixon

believe

You can
Photo by Chris_J

internet,

what you see on the

Just be careful.