High schools are fast-paced environments (Cawelti, 1989), where students feel out of place and lacking meaningful connections with peers and teachers (Brown, 2001). As a response to the call to restructure high schools (Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development, 1995; Hamilton & Mackinnon, 2013), advisory programs that were in existence since the 1800s providing students vocational guidance (Galassi at al., 1997) are now adopted by many school districts. Students exposed to increased amount of stress in high school due to high academic expectations, extracurricular commitments and making decisions about their future are in need of teacher support, which has a negative correlation between it and physical and mental illnesses (Conner, Miles, & Pope, 2014).
Instituting advisor-advisee relationships establishes teacher support, fosters a sense of community (Shulking & Foote, 2009), creates an advocate for that student (Anfara, 2006), and increases levels of personalization (McClure et al., 2010). The current advisory program at The International School of Kenya is not fulfilling its primary objective, which is to address personal and social concerns of students as well as providing that close guidance relationship between advisor and advisee (International School of Kenya, 2016). Rather, administrative activities that interfere with group cohesion and the advisor-advisee bond take place during this program.