"We found no evidence of impaired hatchling orientation, and observed very low levels of light at Peak Island. However, at Curtis Island, hatchlings displayed reduced sea-finding ability, with light horizons from the direction of nearby industry significantly brighter than from other directions. The sea-finding disruption observed at Curtis Island was less pronounced in the presence of moonlight. Conclusions. The reduced sea-finding ability of Curtis Island hatchlings was likely due to both altered light horizons from nearby industry, as well as beach topography."
What do these results imply? Peak Island, which was the more rural area (or one with less artificial light), showed no signs of impaired hatchling orientation, meaning that they could navigate the sea and go towards the moon. However, at Curtis Island, which was the more urban area, displayed signs of disturbed hatchling orientation, due to the bright lights of the nearby industry. The nearby industry, along with beach topography, had altered the light of the horizon, and hatchlings could not as easily (or not at all) have swam toward the sea. This is called phototaxis positive. It is a false perception of the environment in relation to light. Phototaxis positive is when animals' perception of light is boggled by other external sources of light. The suprachiasmatic nucleus, an area of the brain associated with light intensity, is the area that helps notify the brain that it is day or night. With the case of light pollution, night turns into day, and the moon (the source of light truly sensed at night) is just a blurb in the sky. In the case of the sea turtle, hatchlings could not tell where to go, due to an abundance of external artificial light sources.