1 of 54

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

REALISM

Published on Nov 18, 2015

This is a presentation I made for our IS 2 report. Most of its details were based from the publication, Realism and International Relations of Jack Donnelly from Cambridge University Press.

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

REALISM

MORALITY AND FOREIGN POLICY

HUMAN NATURE

AND INTERNATIONAL ANARCHY

“Universal moral principles CANNOT be applied to the actions of states.”
(Morgenthau, 1954: 9)

Photo by yaokcool

“The process of government is a PRACTICAL exercise and NOT a moral one.”
(Kennan, 1954: 48)

Thompson (1985: 20):
“the limitations which the sordid and selfish aspects of human nature place on the conduct of diplomacy”

Morgenthau (1970: 63):
"Man cannot achieve justice for reasons that are inherent in his nature."

Photo by mira66

THE REASONS ARE THREE:

  • Man is too ignorant.
  • Man is too selfish.
  • Man is too poor.
Photo by mira66

"Men are motivated by other desires than the urge for power and that power is not the only aspect of international relations." (Spykman, 1942: 7)

Kenneth Thompson:
"Every man has an insatiable quest for justice."

"To do justice and to receive it is an elemental aspiration of man."
(Morgenthau, 1970)

Photo by Manu_H

"The law of the jungle still prevails"
(Schuman, 1941: 9)

International society is a society without central authority to preserve law and order, and without an official agency to protect its members in the enjoyment of their rights.

In international society, all forms of coercion are permissible, including wars of destruction.

The struggle for power is identical with the struggle for survival.

Photo by dbking

Pursuit of power
is the primary objective of any state.

According to Robert Art and Kenneth Waltz:

"States in anarchy cannot afford to be moral."

Photo by DVIDSHUB

THE AUTONOMY OF POLITICS

and Raison d'Etat

Morgenthau:
"Politics is an autonomous sphere of thought of action." (1962a: 3)
that has a
"realist defense of the autonomy of the political sphere against its subversion by other modes of thought" (1954: 12)

raison d'etat
n. \re-zōⁿ-dā-tä\
"reason of state"

Photo by Hamed Saber

Communitarian philosophy explains that:
person's individuality is the product of community relationships, rather than a product derived only from personal traits

Photo by DonkeyHotey

Statesman is not allowed to:

"offer the same sacrifice on behalf of all his fellow-citizens, or to impose such as self-abnegation on the rest of his society."
(Herbert Butterfield, 1953: 11)

REALIST CONCEPTION

on morality

Morgenthau:
"There is one moral code which is something objective that is to be discovered."

Photo by borkur.net

Realists:
"Moral values appropriate to individual relations cannot be applied to the activities of states."

Photo by HerryLawford

THUCYDIDES

ON JUSTICE AND FOREIGN POLICY
Photo by mikecogh

Athenians:

… if any maintain their independence it is because they are strong, and that if we do not molest them it is because we are afraid…

Photo by enigmabadger

Frantic violence became the attribute of manliness, and the cause of all these evils was the lust for power arising from greed and ambition.

Justice is rare in Thucydides' history but for him,
it is still relevant.

Photo by takomabibelot

EFFECTUAL TRUTH

Political Consequences and public good

Machiavelli:
"It is necessary to a prince, if he wants to maintain himself, to learn to be able not to be good and to use this and not use it according to necessity."

Photo by volna80

One must USE evil,
NOT TO BECOME an evil.

Photo by i k o

Machiavelli:

The prince must not
"depart from good,
WHEN POSSIBLE"

Photo by porchlife

"To use fraud in action is detestable..."

BUT SOMETIMES,
it is
"praiseworthy and glorious"

Photo by marsmet462

Consequentialism says that right or wrong depends on the consequences of an act, and that the more good consequences are produced, the better the act.

Photo by kevin dooley

Deontological ethics (duty-based ethics) judges the morality of an action based on the action's adherence to a rule or rules.

Three ideal types of consequentialism:

  • Egoist
  • Cosmopolitan
  • Nationalist
Photo by fraencko

Machiavelli:
For a leader to maintain his state, a prince need only look after the interests of the people.
"For when men are well governed, they do not go about looking for further liberty."

Photo by kevin dooley

Deontological principle:

Making people not feel too oppressed, is seen as
"good done for the wrong reasons".

Photo by The U.S. Army

According to Machiavelli:
A few must suffer for the sake of the many.

A liberal prince would sacrifice many for the few because he is too merciful to "allow disorders to continue".

HONOR, GLORY,

AND VIRTUE

Machiavelli uses virtu to refer to both “Christian” moral virtues, and to a set of more particularistic “classical” virtues centered on honor.

In Christian virtu:
“One cannot call it virtue to kill one’s citizens, betray ones friends, to be without faith, without mercy, without religion.”

Machiavelli criticizes Christianity because, by refusing to interpret religion “in terms of virtù,”
it has “made the world weak”

Photo by tim caynes

“Those who by their crimes come to be princes.”
Agathocles of Syracuse –(Machiavelli’s “The Prince”)

Agathocles, Machiavelli argues, was able to
"acquire empire, but not glory”.

Photo by Carlo Mirante

One who successfully demonstrates arete is worthy of, even entitled to, honor (time), praise (epainos), and reputation (doxa).
Failure to live up to the demands of arete brings shame (aischron), a reduction in socially perceived worth.

Photo by The U.S. Army

REALIST AMORALISM?

Photo by jfjwak

“Man’s capacity for justice makes democracy possible; but man’s inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary.” – Niebuhr

Photo by Za Rodinu

“We cannot ultimately find a resting place in pure realism.”
- E.H. Carr

Photo by DVIDSHUB

Morgenthau claims:
“I have always maintained that the actions of states are subject to universal moral principles.”

Thucydides and Machiavelli (and Carr and Herz) treat the evil in human nature, the dangers of anarchic international relations, and the necessities of power and interest as problems and a challenge.

Photo by epSos.de

Morgenthau, by contrast, takes evil, anarchy, and power politics as facts of nature, and the final theoretical word.

Photo by Martin Clavey

Untitled Slide