The Cremaster Cycle official website:
http://www.cremaster.net/In order for spectators to try to understand experimental film and expanded cinema, they must actively engage with the questioning and analysing of given texts. Matthew Barney's The Cremaster Cycle (1994-2002) combines five feature length films, performance pieces, photographs, drawings, sculptures and books through a non-linear, free-flowing form. Barney himself does not believe that the entire Cremaster Cycle should be released, as the experience is highly affected by viewing the piece in it's original setting, believing this would question the integrity of the artwork. In trying to understand the work, it is important for spectators to research into Barney's history and the meaning behind particular aspects, such as the cremaster muscle (and it's function), the chosen location and Celtic traditions.
When discussing Expanded Cinema, William Raban notes, 'This degree of openness and reflexivity, of publicly showing works in progress, changed the way in which the audience was involved in the work. No longer passive consumers, audiences became actively engaged in the process of production. The co-op felt like a 'creative laboratory' where experiments were conducted in the scientific sense and a negative outcome was equally as valid as a positive result in showing the way forward' [From Expanded Cinema, 2011, Rees et al. (eds.)].
Think about the relevance of this quote in relation to Expanded Cinema. What does Raban mean by 'a negative outcome was equally as valid as a positive result'? How can you link this to the chosen texts?