No Child left behind Act

The Acts Purpose?

• Signed in 2001.
• Set goals/standards for schools.
• Improvements in school.

Claim

• Claim: Act set reachable standards.
• Outline for schools.
• Prep students for testes. 

Counterclaim

• Act isn't helping.
• Making school work harder.
• Students grade are dropping.

Rebuttal

• Rebuttal: The Acts like an outline for school.
• Helps limit your education for a year.
• Students fail because lack of laziness. 

CLaims & COunterclaims.

• Claim: Acts improving educations 
• Providing new ways to learn.
• Counterclaim: Education is getting harder.

My stance

• The act is a great use.
• Help improved education and the flaws.

Works Cited

-Duncan, Arne. "10 Years Later, Time to Build on 'No Child'." Washington Post. 08 Jan. 2012: A.17. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 01 May. 2014

-Paulson, Amanda. "Achievement Gaps Narrowing in US Schools Since No Child Left Behind." Christian Science Monitor. 01 Oct. 2009: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 01 May. 2014.

-Gerson, Michael. "'No Child' Is Being Left Behind." Washington Post. 20 Jul. 2012: A.19. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 28 Apr. 2014

-Downey, Maureen. "A Decade of No Child Left Behind: A Hit or a Miss?." Atlanta Journal-Constitution. 09 Jan. 2012: A.10. SIRS Issues Researcher.Web. 29 Apr. 2014.