The matching hypothesis suggests individuals seek out partners whose social desirability approximately equals their own. Individual's first assess their own value in the eyes of the potential partner then select the best candidate likely to be attracted to them
Opting for partners similar in social desirability to themselves rather than someone out of their league maximises the chances of relationship formation
Realistic choices considers what the other person desires whether the other person reciprocates the feelings whether other desirable alternatives are available for one or both of them.
This means people have to settle for mating within their league whether or not they want to
30 days later judgements of appearance and resources did not influence interest instead partner preference reflected in the valuation of specific speed dating partners characteristics and romantic attraction across 17 different measures
Matching may not be that important in initial attraction Taylor found no evidence that online daters decision was driven by similarities in physical attractiveness instead data showed an overall preference for attractive partners suggesting that they did not take into account their own attractiveness.
Implications of sex differences if physically attractivness plays a strong role in men's long-term relationship satisfaction then women may experience increased pressure to maintain their appearance in order to maintain their relationship however both sexes also desire partners who are supportive trustworthy and warm so those with partners who displayed these qualities tend to be more satisfied