"Why should our bodies end at the skin?": Embodiment,

"Why should our bodies end at the skin?": Embodiment, Boundaries, and Somatechnics (Shildrick, 2014)

Published on Mar 27, 2016

No Description

View Outline

This is a CRITICAL disability studies paper

body is a static base separate from self

selves and bodies intertwine

"let's rethink how we value these options"

"wait... options?"

let's trouble all our boundaries

Photo by rtppt

individual agency is awesome!

well-defined, governing, totalizing metanarrative

all sorts of things temporarily interacting

user, technology, sociocultural context

the shared condition of becoming (p. 25)

question time!

Slide Notes

"Why should our bodies end at the skin?": Embodiment, Boundaries, and Somatechnics (Shildrick, 2014)

MORE DECKS TO EXPLORE

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

"Why should our bodies end at the skin?": Embodiment, Boundaries, and Somatechnics(Shildrick, 2014)

WARNING

What are the boundaries of a human?

What are the boundaries of a human?

What are the boundaries of a human?

"prosthetic additions... both limit and extend the performativity of the self"(p. 14)

quasi-cartesian

feminism

modernism

postmodernism

Deleuze

premodernism

modernism

postmodernism

modernism

but who does that exclude?

and we expect the includedto be supercrips

molar

athlete as event

what if you don't want tobe a supercrip?

using molar identitiesto disrupt metanarratives

assemblage

technics

somatechnics

what assemblagesare behindwhat we perceive?

"she is not in a state of being, but becoming..." (p. 19)

vulnerability

"Breaking free of molar identities.. is a potential open to all"(p. 23)

thank you

what's the difference betweencritical disability studies&disability studies?

what ethical considerations does (post)modernismhave for disability?

is this describing"being disabled"as an advantage?

TROUBLE EVERYTHING

Friend of Haiku Deck

Error!

"Why should our bodies end at the skin?": Embodiment, Boundaries, and Somatechnics
(Shildrick, 2014)

"prosthetic additions... both limit and extend the performativity of the self"
(p. 14)

and we expect the included
to be supercrips

what if you don't want to
be a supercrip?

using molar identities
to disrupt metanarratives

what assemblages
are behind
what we perceive?

"she is not in a state of being, but becoming..."
(p. 19)

"Breaking free of molar identities.. is a potential open to all"
(p. 23)

what's the difference between
critical disability studies
&
disability studies?

what ethical considerations does (post)modernism
have for disability?

is this describing
"being disabled"
as an advantage?