1 of 17

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

Supply chain management

Published on Nov 18, 2015

No Description

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Supply chain management

case studies of LEGO and Starbucks

contents

  • introduction
  • Lego's big move
  • Starbucks improved supply chain
  • points to ponder
  • conclusion

Supply chain management

  • management of the flow of goods
  • two very different case studies
  • both have visible supply chains
  • both companies follow sustainability practices
Photo by CIMMYT

Lego

  • 6th largest toy company
  • 1932 Ole Kirk Christiansen founded the company
  • From moulding till distribution takes 10 days
  • Market = 130 countries, USA and Mexico
  • All suppliers have to sign a code of conduct

Raw Materials

  • Plastics: Saudi Arabia and Kuwait
  • Pocessed in countries like Singapore, Korea etc
  • Manufacturing in Billund, Denmark
  • Rubber: Malaysia and Thailand
  • After processing shipped to rubber trading centers

The Big Move

  • 2004: 20% of logistics were cut
  • Distribution centers were all consolidated into one in Czech Republic 
  • 2008: 19-percent jump in annual revenue, 21% profit margin
  • Transport was outsourced by DHL due to seasonal sales
  • before: 55 transporter providers, 11 warehouses and now 2 carriers
Photo by RLHyde

The big move

  • transportation issues
  • skilled labour
  • reduction in number of products and services
  • "odd" orders and transport inefficiency
Photo by bobrayner

Benefits to LEgo

  • 2005 to 2008: 35% in sales, cost reduced from 75% to 33%
  • Number of touches reduced to one
  • lower cost of labor, value added tasks by labour 
  • transport company could increase base of service
  • unnecessary inventory was reduced

Conflict with DHL

Starbucks Supply Chain Management

Photo by clarkk

Starbucks

  • 16,700 retail stores, 50 mil customers
  • coffee and other merchandise is supplied
  • 2007 to 2008: supply chain expenses rose by $825 mil
  • New stores but supply chain was old
  • http://www.starbucks.com/responsibility

Need to change

  • 2008: analysis of supply chain
  • 60 to 70% expenses were tied to third party logistics (3PLs)
  • simplify the complex, bring costs down, improved supply chain
  • Africa, Asia, Latin America to US and Europe
  • 5 Regional DCs in USA, 2 in Asia and 2 in Europe
Photo by Krista76

Simplify the complex

  • 4 basic supply chain functions
  • plan
  • source
  • make 
  • deliver

reducing costs and improving inefficiencies

  • 'should cost' model
  • regionalizing coffee production: 4 coffee plants
  • Washington, Nevada, York + Columbia
Photo by Ian Aberle

One World One Logistic System

  • stores are supplied by either regional DC or small warehouse
  • 45 Central DCs; dairy products, baked goods, and paper items like cups and napkins
  • 3PLs were reviewed for productivity and contrast rates
  • more confidence in company, retained supply chain talent, increased savings
  • complete supply chain sketched and one logistics systems throughout
Photo by Matt. Create.

Conclusion

  • unexpected benefits
  • conflict resolution
  • supply chain knowledge retention
  • simplify
  • reduce when necessary
Photo by Mr.Tea

References