1 of 28

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

Miranda V. Arizona

No Description

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Miranda v. Arizona
A children’s primer
By Ethan p. Kingston

Photo by Al_HikesAZ

This is a children’s book on the Supreme Court Case of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, which was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prevents prosecutors from using a person’s statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial unless they can show that the person was informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning, and of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning, and that the defendant not only understood these rights, but voluntarily waived them.1

Photo by seychelles88

Do you know your rights?

Photo by Gabry$

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT

STOP TALKING , DON’T ANSWER QUESTIONS

ANYTHING YOU SAY CAN AND WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU

IN A COURT OF LAW

YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO HAVE AN ATTORNEY PRESENT

DURING ANY INTERROGATION

IF YOU CANNOT AFFORD AN ATTORNEY

ONE WILL BE APPOINTED FOR YOU
Photo by Wesley Fryer

WHAT CAN POLICE ASK YOU WITHOUT READING YOU YOUR RIGHTS?

ONLY GENERAL QUESTIONS
Photo by freefotouk

OK TO ANSWER

  • What is your name?
  • What is your address?
  • What is your date of birth?
  • What is your social security number?
  • What is your parents phone number?
  • what is your parents name?

ASK FOR AN ATTORNEY AND YOUR PARENTS

THEN SHUT UP

Ernesto Miranda received a new trial based upon the Supreme Court ruling.

Photo by IslesPunkFan

HIS ORIGINAL CONFESSION WAS THROWN OUT

BASED ON THE EVIDENCE, MIRANDA WAS AGAIN CONVICTED
Photo by David Veksler

THE MIRANDA WARNINGS CAME OUT OF THE SUPREME COURT CASE ,WHICH WAS 54 YEARS OLD ON JUNE 13,2019.
THIS CASE WAS A LANDMARK CASE ON THE FIFTH AMENDMENT.

THE MIRANDA WARNINGS CAME OUT OF THE SUPREME COURT CASE WHICH WAS 54 YEARS OLD ON JUNE 13, 2019. THIS CASE WAS A LANDMARK CASE ON THE FIFTH AMENDMENT. ERNESTO MIRANDA WAS ARRESTED IN MARCH 1963 IN PHOENIX ARIZONA AND CONFESSED WHILE IN POLICE CUSTODY.
Photo by W

ERNESTO MIRANDA WAS ARRESTED IN MARCH 1963 IN PHOENIX ARIZONA AND CONFESSED WHILE IN POLICE Custody.

Photo by W

His lawyer sought to overturn the conviction because Mr. Miranda was not told he had a right to an attorney or

Photo by W

A right to remain silent. He had however, signed a confession that acknowledged that he understood his rights.

Photo by W

The Supreme Court overturned
Miranda’s conviction
June 13, 1966.

Photo by W

Their ruling established the guidelines for how detained suspects are informed of

Photo by W

Their constitutional rights under the 5th Amendment.

Photo by W

It was a 5-4 decision.

Photo by W

The Miranda warnings include elements of the fifth amendment

Photo by W

Protection against self-incrimination

Photo by W

Elements of the
Sixth amendment

Photo by W

A right to counsel

Photo by W

Elements of the
14th amendment

Photo by W

Application of the ruling to all 50 states

Photo by W