•Meeting is “any meeting of a political subdivision supported wholly or in part by public funds” • Considered “meeting” even if no official action is taken • Examples: board meeting, committee meeting, workgroup session, discussion of proposals, information gathering,
Two members can be a meeting depending on the facts. • Was a matter discussed on which the Board may take foreseeable action? If yes, then meeting. • Social Gatherings- not “meeting” if discussion of business is incidental and intermittent
Two members can be a meeting depending on the facts. • Was a matter discussed on which the Board may take foreseeable action? If yes, then meeting. • Social Gatherings- not “meeting” if discussion of business is incidental and intermittent
The FOIA requires that all meetings of the governing bodies of all municipalities be held openly, and that notice of such meetings be given to the public.
The Arkansas Supreme Court has held that decision-making by means of a private "polling" of a governing body, without that process being made open to the public, violates the open meetings requirement.
Meetings may be conducted by teleconference when properly noticed.
• Entitled to learn of action taken as well as reasons for making such action, including deliberations, discussions, and information gathering • Must be given reasonable access to meeting • Does not grant right to public participation, instead right to be informed of governmental actions • No secret vote, public should be advised of performance of individual board members • If minutes of meeting kept, must be available for inspection and copying
• Does not apply to future records not yet in existence (no ongoing requests) • Applies to existing records, no need to create record • Request must be detailed enough that custodian can locate record with “reasonable effort” • Does not matter whether request is unduly burdensome
-birth date -SSN -medical information -DL numbers -insurance coverage -tax information or withholding -payroll deductions -banking information -unlisted telephone numbers -home addresses of non-elected public employees -personal e-mail addresses -marital status of employees and information about dependents. •benefits information, such as pension, is also exempt from disclosure
A “employee evaluation or job performance record” refers to any record (1) created by or at the behest of the employer (2) to evaluate the employee (3) that details the employee’s performance or lack of performance on the job.
Example: A record generated while investigating allegations of employee misconduct that details incidents giving rise to the allegations.
A “personnel record” is any record other than an employee evaluation record that pertains to an individual employee.
A personnel record is only exempt “to the extent that disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.”
The public’s interest is measured by “the extent to which disclosure of the information sought would ‘shed light on an agency’s performance of its statutory duties’ or otherwise let citizens know ‘what their government is up to.’”
The public interest will usually outweigh any privacy interest.
Unremarkable communication concerning day-to-day office admin and activities
??????
Examples *correspondence not attempting to influence state policy *email sent to large number of people at same time via email distribution message *agency event notice (no value after being calendared or attended by employee) *routine requests for public records *incoming letters or memos of transmittal that add nothing of substance to enclosures