Activity 2
No Description
MORE DECKS TO EXPLORE
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
HOW CAN SCIENCE HARM SOCIETY?
INTRO
The article, "The Immoral Landscape? Scientists Are Associated with Violations of Morality" by Bastiaan T. Rutjens and Steven J. Heine, explores how science can sometimes be harmful to society. The article discusses how the sciences are well respected but still are riddled with morally questionable acts. An idea of these morally questionable acts is not worrying about the consequences of their research and just pushing forward to their vision of the answer. These beliefs may people might fear that science could harm society by allowing immoral values.
The article, "The Immoral Landscape? Scientists Are Associated with Violations of Morality" by Bastiaan T. Rutjens and Steven J. Heine, explores how science can sometimes be harmful to society. The article discusses how the sciences are well respected but still are riddled with morally questionable acts. An idea of these morally questionable acts is not worrying about the consequences of their research and just pushing forward to their vision of the answer. These beliefs may people might fear that science could harm society by allowing immoral values.
Photo by Andrew from Sydney
Untitled Slide
Morality
Building on the idea that scientists are seen as morally ambiguous, the article discusses how specific stereotypes reinforce this perception. They state that "scientists were stereotyped as robot-like and lacking emotions, as well as valuing knowledge over morality and being potentially dangerous"(Rutjens). Similarly, the Time Traveler in the story seems to place no emphasis on what the implications of time travel are and just precedes with it no matter the consequences.
Building on the idea that scientists are seen as morally ambiguous, the article discusses how specific stereotypes reinforce this perception. They state that "scientists were stereotyped as robot-like and lacking emotions, as well as valuing knowledge over morality and being potentially dangerous"(Rutjens). Similarly, the Time Traveler in the story seems to place no emphasis on what the implications of time travel are and just precedes with it no matter the consequences.
Photo by NASA APPEL Knowledge Services
Untitled Slide
Danger
The article further explores the consequences of these negative perceptions of scientists. They argue that "it seems that scientists are viewed as somewhat unpredictable, in that they can be potentially dangerous"(Rutjens). This view fuels public distrust in science, as people fear that the pursuit of knowledge might come at the expense of moral values and the well being of society. This idea connects with the book when the Time Traveler while in the future causes immense damage and loss of life which could lead to severe issues and setting the precedent that time travel could be used to harm entire generations.
The article further explores the consequences of these negative perceptions of scientists. They argue that "it seems that scientists are viewed as somewhat unpredictable, in that they can be potentially dangerous"(Rutjens). This view fuels public distrust in science, as people fear that the pursuit of knowledge might come at the expense of moral values and the well being of society. This idea connects with the book when the Time Traveler while in the future causes immense damage and loss of life which could lead to severe issues and setting the precedent that time travel could be used to harm entire generations.
Photo by Timothy Valentine
Untitled Slide
Conclusion
To conclude, the article emphasizes the importance of addressing these negative views and stereotypes to prevent harm to society and the scientific field. It suggest that the fear of scientists and the idea that they "amoral or even immoral" figures could hinder the public's acceptance of scientific advancements. They argue that fostering a better understanding of the ethical standards in science is crucial for ensuring that scientific progress is seen as a positive force that aligns with societal values, rather than a possibility of harm.
To conclude, the article emphasizes the importance of addressing these negative views and stereotypes to prevent harm to society and the scientific field. It suggest that the fear of scientists and the idea that they "amoral or even immoral" figures could hinder the public's acceptance of scientific advancements. They argue that fostering a better understanding of the ethical standards in science is crucial for ensuring that scientific progress is seen as a positive force that aligns with societal values, rather than a possibility of harm.
Photo by kleuske
