1 of 21

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

Cruel and Unusaul Punishments to A certain extent

Published on Nov 20, 2015

cruel and unusaul punishments for lit

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Cruel and Unusaul Punishments to A certain extent

By: Michael Cusick
Photo by Leo Reynolds

Constitution

  • 8th admendment prohibites exessive fine and cruel and unusaul punishments
  •  dosent show its clarity on what is a cruel and unusaul punishment
Photo by Ken Lund

Disection of the 8th admendment

Requries extensive interpretation and elaboration.
Photo by deltaMike

No standard For determing what a cruel and unusaul punishment means, But usualy changes as society changes.

Brennon Supreme court 1972: "a punishment cant be so severe as to be degrading to the diginity of a human being"

Photo by deltaMike

Positives of cruel and unusaul punishments

Photo by Jinx!

Treats a free human to control his own destiny for good or evil.

Photo by betta design

Criminals takes from good people in order to benefit themselfs

Photo by Benson Kua

Criminals deserves punishments and protects society morall by restoring order.

Photo by marsmet526

Cons of cruel and unusaul punishments

Violates the humans rights

Is inhuman to give criminals a undeserved punishment.

Photo by marsmet545

Two wrongs dont make a right.

Photo by Bob.Fornal

The criminal cant compensate if given a cruel punishment

Photo by joe-manna

Jason VS Hobbs

Photo by JohRo2012

Kuntrell Jackson (14) with two older boys travis booker and derrick sheild planned to rob a video store. Kuntrell found out Sheild had a shot gun and he killed the clerk. All were convicted of murder and sent to jail for life with no parole.

Miller Vs alabama

Photo by theqspeaks

Even miller (14) and colby smith killed Cole cannon with a baseball bat and burned his trailer house down. Even was triled as an adult and sentence to life with out parole.

Photo by Just Us 3

Question For both

Photo by Bilal Kamoon

Does life without parole sentence on a fourteen year old violate the 8th admendment.

Photo by kevin dooley

Supreme cout decision

5-4 reversing the ruling. It was unconstitutio-nal

Photo by kevin dooley