Fair Use Awakens...

Published on Nov 18, 2015

This deck accompanies our panel proposal for SXSWEDU 2016; we hope to support attendees who wish to inspire and educate students by incorporating follow-on works, fanfiction, fanart and other creatively educational experiences that exist because fair use is a lawful use of copyright.

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Untitled Slide

Copyright protects original works of authorship including literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works, such as poetry, novels, movies, songs, computer software, and architecture.

Photo by jeffsmallwood

Also, the design of boat hulls!

Photo by orbtal media

Untitled Slide

  • Not ideas
  • Not brand names
  • (Sometimes logos)
  • Not a single note or chord
  • Not effort or "sweat of the brow"
  • Not something old enough to be in the public domain

Facts Are Not Copyrightable.

A person's actual face is not protectable by copyright.
(But it might be a trademark.)

Franklin Mint Corp. v. Nat’l Wildlife Art Exch., Inc., 575 F.2d 62, 65 (3d Cir. 1978).
Photo by afagen

But if a work draws on prior creations, the copyright protection only covers what is new and original.

Copyright terms have grown...

The public domain
seems far away...

New works enter the public domain every Jan. 1.

Many policies & rules are
out of date

Columbia University's publicly accessible Fair Use checklist hasn't been revised since 2008. It predates cases like Google Books, Cariou v Prince, the "Jersey Boys" case and so much more. https://copyright.columbia.edu/content/dam/copyright/Precedent%20Docs/fairu...
Villanova directs students and professors to a Copyright Management Center at Purdue that hasn't existed in years, and hasn't updated its Fair Use Check list in almost a decade.
The page at http://www.copyright.com/Services/copyrightoncampus/basics/fairuse_list.htm... that is supposedly education-focused is also from 2008.

When were your fair use policies updated? Are you relying on explanations from almost a decade ago?

Even when something is in the public domain,

someone may claim it isn't.
Photo by bcostin

Copyright Office Exemptions

OTW requests expansions under the DMCA
Some believe it is fundamentally broken; corporations believe that the every-three-years renewal process makes it difficult for them to create multi-year forward-thinking business plans.
https://www.eff.org/issues/dmca-rulemaking
Photo by Eneas

what does Fair Use allow?

When Art Inspires
Photo by Sam Howzit

Fair Use is not:

  • Plagiarism
  • Unethical
  • Infringement
  • Uncreative
  • File sharing on publicly accessible sites
  • A rigid and unchanging checklist
  • Shrinking (at the moment)
  • An exception to copyright
Photo by Shiny Things

It's set out in U.S. law.

Fair use is a lawful use of copyright.
"On the Road" will be copyrighted in the US until 2053 unless copyright terms shrink. That's very unlikely.
Photo by James Clayton

Four Factors

  • Purpose & Character of Follow-On Use (and what is a commercial use?)
  • Nature of the Copyrighted Work
  • Amount and Substantiality of Portion Used vs Work as a Whole
  • Effect of the Use on Potential Market For or Value Of Copyrighted Work
Photo by Kelli Tungay

A transformative work shifts the context from the purpose the source work was created for, to a different purpose or meaning in the follow-on work.
Bill Graham Archives, LLC v. Dorling Kindersley Ltd., 448 F.3d 605 (2d Cir. 2006).

Transformativeness in meaning provides necessary breathing room to artists reacting to the world around them. The world includes works protected by copyright.

Fair Use
allows everyone an opportunity to engage with others' works in new and unex-
pected ways.

Photo by danmachold

But Statutory Penalties

are impractically high, if you're reasonable but wrong.
Photo by Novemberdelta

Under the DMCA's "safe harbor" provisions, site policies & terms of use dictate how each online platform removes content - blog posts, videos and tweets - in response to copyright holder complaints.
However...

Photo by Anita363

Sites, ISPs, social media hosts & nonprofits have no (practical) way of knowing whether a particular use of a work is authorized by the rightsholder, or is used
legally, under fair use.

How to respond to a DMCA Takedown Notice:
http://heidi8.tumblr.com/post/111076144999/have-you-heard-about-the-tumblr-...

If a student gets a takedown notice on YouTube, Facebook or another site, the link above has instructions on how to "counter-notice" and hopefully have the content restored.
Photo by marfis75

Fraudsters & manipulators take advantage of the imbalance by sowing fear.
How do you reply to an unfair
C&D demand?

http://artlawjournal.com/tips-responding-getty-images-demand-letter/
Use law schools as resources; clinics and professors are often able to help when fair use is being attacked by an unfair claim from a copyright holder.
Photo by Jared Klett

(One weird trick?)

The Statute of Limitations
Photo by Hannaford

Copyright encourages creativity and innovation,
when it preserves and promotes ample
breathing space
for unexpected and
innovative uses.

Follow-On Works can counteract silencing and censorship. But it's risky.

Photo by Kalexanderson

Are there safe harbors for follow-on works?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/10/19/openly-licensed-educational-reso... includes a discussion of how "openly licensed educational materials are being used to solve local education challenges around the world".
Photo by stonebird

What Content Are You Creating?

  • Is there's an open-licensed version of the content you want to use?
  • If so, how do you comply with the license? Credit? Linkbacks?
  • Do licenses limit your "fair use" rights?
  • What are you doing with your follow-on work? Selling one copy? Mass production? Display online?
Photo by Teppo

Heidi Tandy

Haiku Deck Pro User