1 of 20

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

DFES

Published on Nov 19, 2015

No Description

View Outline

MORE DECKS TO EXPLORE

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

1.

DUTCH FORK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEXINGTON/RICHLAND 5

TITLE I SCHOOL GRADES PRE-K-5 APPROXIMATELY 560 STUDENTS
Photo by johnmuk
2.

30 SECOND GRADERS TOTAL FOR STUDY

15 with technology integration compared to 15 without technology
Photo by katerha
3.

PURPOSE OF STUDY

PUT USEFUL TECHNOLOGY IN THE HANDS OF DFES SECOND GRADERS
Photo by martinak15
4.

HOW TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AFFECTS:

OVERALL ACHIEVEMENT, READING INTEREST, & BEHAVIOR
5.

WILL INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND PROGRESS ON ASSESSMENTS

TO DETERMINE IF TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION
Photo by WarmSleepy
6.

HYPOTHESIS ONE

30% OR MORE WILL HAVE INCREASED TEST SCORES BY AT LEAST 10%
Photo by Pink Sherbet Photography
7.

TO DETERMINE IF TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION

WILL INCREASE STUDENT INTEREST IN READING
Photo by indi.ca
8.

HYPOTHESIS TWO

50% or more of students will agree that technology increased reading interest
Photo by Pink Sherbet Photography
9.

TO DETERMINE IF TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION

WILL SHOW AN IMPROVEMENT IN OVERALL BEHAVIOR
Photo by twicepix
10.

HYPOTHESIS THREE

20% OR MORE STUDENTS WILL AGREE THAT TECHNOLOGY IMPROVED OVERALL BEHAVIOR
Photo by Pink Sherbet Photography
11.

METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION

12.

STUDENT RESULTS FROM FALL AND WINTER MAP TESTS

13.

SURVEY FOR READING INTEREST

BEFORE AND AFTER TECHNOLOGY
14.

RUBRIC FOR BEHAVIOR

BEFORE AND AFTER TECHNOLOGY
15.

STUDENTS WITH TECHNOLOGY 40% INCREASE BY 10%

STUDENTS WITHOUT 6.7% INCREASE BY 10%
Photo by PNASH
16.

Untitled Slide

17.

4 OUT OF 5 QUESTIONS

QUESTIONS 1-3 AND 5 SUPPORTED HYPOTHESIS
Photo by PNASH
18.

Untitled Slide

19.

3 OUT OF 4 CATEGORIES

SUPPORTED HYPOTHESIS THREE
Photo by PNASH
20.

RECOMMENDATIONS

FURTHER STUDY ACROSS GRADES, COMPARISON SCHOOL, RESEARCH NEW TECHNOLOGY
Photo by apdk

Kimberly Morris