1 of 31

Slide Notes

DownloadGo Live

Prop 34 Workshop

Published on Dec 07, 2015

No Description

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

PROP 34

JOHN GIVEN
Photo by k.landerholm

GOALS

IMPORTANCE OF STATE/LOCAL ELECTIONS

MANY IMPORTANT POLICIES ARE DECIDED AT THE STATE AND LOCAL LEVEL.
Photo by Vox Efx

HOW DO WE DECIDE COMPLEX ISSUES?

Photo by Dave77459

SHOULD WE ALLOW A SMALL MINORITY TO DECIDE?

SOME BALLOT MEASURES ARE DECIDED BY ONLY 15% OF ELIGIBLE VOTERS

INACTION IS A CHOICE

Photo by Leo Reynolds

THE DEATH PENALTY

A BRIEF HISTORY

PREHISTORY - MIGHT MAKES RIGHT

NO DEATH PENALTY PER SE, BUT MAYBE THE GOLDEN RULE?

CODE OF HAMMURABI

DEATH PENALTY FIRST CODIFIED (BABYLON, 1700 BC)

OFFENSES PUNISHABLE BY DEATH IN THE ANCIENT WORLD

SERIOUS CRIMES: MURDER, TREASON, ARSON, RAPE
Photo by Zach Dischner

CRIMES PUNISHABLE BY DEATH - MIDDLE AGES TO 19TH CENTURY

MORE AND MORE CRIMES, SOME PETTY (160 CRIMES IN ENGLAND'S "BLOODY CODE")

ALTERNATIVES: BANISHMENT, COMPENSATION, MERCY

EVEN IN 18TH CENTURY ENGLAND, CRIMINALS SENT TO COLONIES IN US OR AUSTRALIA

RELIGION AND THE DEATH PENALTY

THOU SHALT NOT KILL?
Photo by One lucky guy

DEATH PENALTY IN THE US

ALLOWED IN ALL THIRTEEN ORIGINAL COLONIES

ARSON, PIRACY, TREASON, MURDER, BURGLARY, ROBBERY, RAPE, HORSE-STEALING, ETC.

PERMITTED BY CONSTITUTION

SEE FIFTH AMENDMENT
Photo by space_monkey

ABOLITION MOVEMENT

MID-19TH CENTURY: MICHIGAN, RHODE ISLAND, WISCONSIN OUTLAW DEATH PENALTY
Photo by mira66

SECOND REFORM ERA 1895-1917

NINE MORE STATES: ME, KS, MN, ND, SD, OR, AZ, MO, TN
Photo by fusionpanda

THIRD REFORM ERA 1957-1972

1957: HI, AK; 1958-61: DE; 1964-65: IA, NY, WV, VT
Photo by -JvL-

1972: FURMAN V GEORGIA

DEATH PENALTY UNCONSTITUTIONAL (TOO ARBITRARY)

1976: GREGG V GEORGIA

BIFURCATED TRIALS, APPELLATE REVIEW, DEATH NO LONGER ARBITRARY
Photo by Jason OX4

OTHER SUPREME COURT CASES

PROPORTIONALITY, INSANITY, AGE, DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY
Photo by j3net

CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATES

34 STATES CURRENTLY ALLOW IMPOSITION OF DEATH SENTENCE

NO DEATH IN CA FOLLOWING FURMAN CASE (1972)

ALSO, CAL SUPREME CT: PEOPLE V ANDERSON
Photo by superfem

PROP 7 (1978)

REINSTATES DEATH BY PROVIDING CONSTITUTIONAL SAFEGUARDS

13 EXECUTIONS SINCE 1978

725 INMATES ON DEATH ROW, MORATORIUM SINCE 2006

WHY SHOULD WE CARE?

WHAT ARE THE COSTS/BENEFITS OF VOTING YES/NO?

PROP 34

WHAT WOULD IT DO?

PROP 34

LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS

PROP 34

ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST

PROP 34

ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION